Upgrading the Fujitsu U810 with 64GB SSD

I recently decided to upgrade my Fujitsu U810 with a solid state drive.
Unfortunately, since the U810 only offers a PATA interface the options are quite limited to just a few high-priced (compared to SATA) 1.8″ SSD models by either Samsung, Sandisk (SanDisk SSD UATA 5000, discontinued) or MTRON (MSD-PATA3018-032-ZIF2 et al.).
I went for a 64 GB SLC drive manufactured by Samsung. The exact model name is MCCOE64GEMPP. The same 1.8″ PATA-drive is available as bulk version without the metal enclosure that is protecting the PCB: MCCOE64GQMPQ

Here are some photos of the drive itself and how to install it in the U810. Note, the drive is 5 mm high and will fit into the U810 without any modifications.
Also keep in mind that the U1010 has a different connector (50-pin IDE instead of ZIF), so these ZIF-drives will not work here. However, there are reports on UMPC Portal that suggest that it is possible to get a replacement connector flat band cable for the U810 that is the 50pin IDE cable, so I guess it is also possible the other way around for the U1010.


dsc00321dsc00323
dsc00238dsc00324

Here are the obligatory benchmarks comparing the new SSD against the old Toshiba MK1011GAH 100 GB hard drive that was previously installed in the U810:


Toshiba MK1011GAH:

hdtune_info_toshiba_mk1011gahhdtune_benchmark_toshiba_mk1011gah
crystal50crystal100crystal500


Samsung MCCOE64GEMPP:

hdtune_info_samsung_pza064_ssdhdtune_benchmark_samsung_pza064_ssd
crystal50_samsung_pza064_ssdcrystal100_samsung_pza064_ssdcrystal500_samsung_pza064_ssd

Needless to say that applications cold-launch a lot faster with the SSD. (Firefox with 12 add-ons: ~10 s before -> ~6 s after, Chrome: ~3 s before, ~1 s after, Thunderbird: ~8 s before -> ~3 s after).

Startup time was reduced quite a bit but not dramatically. However, returning from sleep and hibernate saw a huge improvement. Unfortunately I can not provide values of the old drive, so no comparison.
I did not notice longer battery run times. However, the whole system runs a lot cooler because the SSD naturally does not produce heat as extensive as the HDD did.

I am satisfied with this upgrade – especially since it has boosted compile-times when working with CodeGear RAD Studio and Delphi – due to the great performance when accessing, reading and writing small files. Your mileage may vary.

Tags: , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Saturday, January 10th, 2009 at 22:32 and is filed under Fujitsu U810 . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Upgrading the Fujitsu U810 with 64GB SSD”

  • Clayton Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 23:18

    Hey there! Thanks for the post. Very useful for those – like me – evaluating this device. Quick question: have you considered install other (bigger) HDD’s instead of the SSD you choose? And… this SSD one is pricey, isn’t it? I found it starting at $500 (I’m looking for U810 for about the same price…).

  • Andre Says:
    March 21st, 2009 at 0:30

    Yes, before upgrading to the SSD I replaced the original 40 GB HDD with a 100 GB Toshiba HDD (see above). This drive does only fit into the U810 after a few modifications, since it is too high (8 mm versus 5 mm).
    Performance, especially access times for 1.8″ HDDs are generally bad. These drives are designed mostly for portable media players like the iPod where the requirements are different from those of modern UMPCs.
    Also, I intend to use my U810 in my car where vibrations might cause damage to a HDD in long term. SSD is definitely more sturdy and gives peace of mind.
    I bought my Samsung SSD on eBay and got a good deal. The MTRON drives are cheaper. However, I’m not sure if they work in the U810.

  • Chad Says:
    March 18th, 2010 at 20:53

    Is it possible to load the OS and run the computer from a Compact Flash, SD or SD HC card?

Leave a Reply